You’re nuts!
Nothing “proves” that Romney’s statements regarding Global Warming would result in his implementation of the policies Obama has implemented, or the extremes to which his agencies have gone.
The same is true for every other generalization you’ve made.
Nope. I can read.
GET REAL, G Larry. I mean, grow some eyes.
Those of us who have actually done our due diligence on Romney and investigated his record have eyes to see.
Somebody made the bitterly absurd angry foot stomp here recently that conservatives stayed home and "elected" Obama. A one hundred percent emotion-based statement, all cause-and-effect entitlement based, tinged with anger.
Conservatives had no one to elect.
G Larry and anyone else reading who would vote for Romney or Jeb or Santorum or Christie or like-minded government statist solely because he wasn't Hillary, or whoever the next Democrat nightmare will be -- you can vote for that if you want.
All it will do is make things worse whether it wins or loses.
The candidate who gets votes will be the candidate who offers something to vote FOR, as in LIMITED GOVERNMENT. Take schools away from the Feds and give them back to local communities. Get government out of health care and health insurance. Get government out of setting "minimum" wages. Get government out of punishing people for refusing to play along with the pretend "marriage" of two homosexuals. Stifle government tyranny over farming and energy industries on pretense of all of its EPA-driven global warming madness.
People want to vote FOR that.
If all they have to vote for is more of the same but in a guy not as scary, they're going to stay home.
AGAIN.
Hello?