Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: varyouga
Why did the laws make them suddenly stop if the laws stayed the same and very few users are caught? They probably didn't truly want to use in the first place. Please educate me on their mentality as I have never met anyone like this. I'm extremely social and have been to dozens of cities and countries all over the world. I've ranged from dirt poor to wealthy. Never have I met a person in my life who didn't use because of laws. Most people I know don't use but it is always their personal decision. Not even one person mentioned laws, ever, in any conversation.

You really can't imagine someone avoiding pot because it is illegal, or succumbing to temptation and enjoying it but deciding against breaking the law to make it a habit, or not hanging out with drug users because of the work they do, or the aspirations they have?

You haven't known young people who saw that breaking the law for drugs would interfere with a chosen field of work, or truck drivers and GIs who quit because of the laws, or professionals who realized the risk and ended that youthful carelessness?

57 posted on 06/20/2014 12:55:54 PM PDT by ansel12 ((Ted Cruz and Mike Lee-both of whom sit on the Senate Judiciary Comm as Ginsberg's importance fades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: ansel12

“You really can’t imagine someone avoiding pot because it is illegal, or succumbing to temptation and enjoying it but deciding against breaking the law to make it a habit, or not hanging out with drug users because of the work they do, or the aspirations they have?
You haven’t known young people who saw that breaking the law for drugs would interfere with a chosen field of work, or truck drivers and GIs who quit because of the laws, or professionals who realized the risk and ended that youthful carelessness?”

I have met people who don’t use because their line of work requires random urine testing and/or a polygraph. I don’t really consider this law because they can quit that job or fail a test without legal consequences.

Outside of law enforcement, security or some entry level jobs nobody cares about a drug possession record. Especially for regarded professionals in an in-demand field. I could have multiple felonies on my record and my phone would still be ringing off the hook because I’m known for quality work.

The only law that would reduce drug use is requiring ALL people to take random urine or polygraph tests with imprisonment as a consequence. Would you consider that acceptable in what remains of our once free nation?


77 posted on 06/20/2014 1:45:50 PM PDT by varyouga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson