Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: don-o

But I thought he didn’t have any????


4 posted on 06/19/2014 9:01:42 AM PDT by Principled (Obama: Unblemished by success.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Principled

Very confusing, isn’t it?


8 posted on 06/19/2014 9:02:55 AM PDT by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Principled

Exactly. I just heard on NBC news Brian Williams last night, that the whole Iraq war was based on George Bush’s lies about WMD.


31 posted on 06/19/2014 9:22:34 AM PDT by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Principled
But I thought he didn’t have any????

The odds of Saddam destroying all of his WMD are about the same as the odds that Assad will destroy all of his. In other words, nil. Saddam destroyed quite a bit that the UN documented, but they were many that Saddam's own paper work said existed, but were not verified destroyed by the UN.

Look the way this was suppose to work was, after Saddam was taken out, Iran was next. If we had taken down Iran after Saddam, the entire region would have been better off. Israel would have taken care of Assad. Instead, the progresso Islamic terrorist but kissing morons decided to attack Bush for lying about WMD that the UN had documentation that stated the WMD existed. That is why the world is about to explode.

47 posted on 06/19/2014 10:06:31 AM PDT by justa-hairyape (The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Principled
There were always chemical weapons on Iraq...
97 posted on 06/19/2014 4:21:09 PM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson