Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RegulatorCountry
In most instances they were born in the home and their mothers remained, but were not allowed to see their children. Didn’t want them bonding since the goal was adoption ...

But that is in contradiction to the report by Dr Sutherland, who made great efforts to survey such homes. He reported that in the Tuam Home, after the infants were two months old, the mothers were allowed to have them beside them at night.

http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/news/author-battled-clergy-to-gain-firsthand-experience-of-motherandbaby-homes-30337249.html

Babies in these homes were routinely nursed by their mothers, because feeding them any other way was extremely expensive.

44 posted on 06/18/2014 6:20:39 PM PDT by BlackVeil ('The past is never dead. It's not even past.' William Faulkner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: BlackVeil

I’d have to go and find the links, but several accounts of women who were in those homes for unwed mothers indicate that nursing babies were given to lactating women who were not their mothers. One woman talked about nursing multiple babies, none were hers.


45 posted on 06/18/2014 6:34:03 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson