The CBS article specifically says secular rebels.
There are statements by Jordanian officials that ISIS members were among those trained.
Yet they remain conveniently anonymous.
You have provided no explanation regarding where ISIS received their training
First, I don't see a whole lot of training.
Second, Al-Qaeda and other groups do plenty of their own training, as do other powers' secret services like Turkey and Russia, to name two.
their U.S. made weapons, and other material
The weapons they have seem to be a combination of old Russian arms and confiscated US arms left behind by Iraqi deserters.
There is nothing more to say.
From your perspective I can see why.
This is very flimsy reasoning.
You disagree with the article. I get that.
I don't "disagree" with it - you disagree with opinions.
I am calling out the article for assuming facts not in evidence.
U.S.: Syrian rebel group tied to al Qaeda in Iraq
WASHINGTON The Obama administration is declaring a Syrian rebel group with alleged ties to al Qaeda as a terrorist organization. It's an effort to blunt the influence of extremists as the U.S. steps up cooperation with the Syrian opposition.
The State Department's action blocks Jabhat al-Nusra's assets in the U.S. and bars Americans from doing business with the group.
The move hasn't been announced officially but was included in the Federal Register on Monday. The department said the group was part of al Qaeda in Iraq.
Now you are just playing games with words.
You have provided no evidence whatsoever.
You have made one incredulous assumption after another.
First, you assume every fighter the Obama Administration trained was a “secularist” whatever that is supposed to mean.
You assume all of the fighters trained were 100% honest and virtuous and would never lie to the U.S. officials giving them arms, training and whatever else.
You assume anyone who says ISIS was trained and armed in Jordan is automatically lying.
This is just a waste of my time.
We just have to agree to disagree.