So why is this pipeline different than all the others? Why is it not already in service? Why has it been debated longer than US in WW2?
1 posted on
06/17/2014 5:00:14 AM PDT by
thackney
To: thackney
However this Keystone decision is finally made, some people are going to be very happy, relieved and think it was the right decision and some people are going to be distraught and even angry and upset, thinking it was a terrible decision so I dont think we should put our relationship on the backs of this decision. How is that "weighing in"?? She didn't say anything.
2 posted on
06/17/2014 5:03:51 AM PDT by
Opinionated Blowhard
("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
To: thackney
We DO have a lot of pipelines crossing our border ?
Where ?
How many ?
The only one I know of that I'm sure is still operational is the one on our southern border, pumping mexicans and others into our country.
3 posted on
06/17/2014 5:04:58 AM PDT by
knarf
(I say things that are true .. I have no proof .. but they're true.)
To: thackney
Hillary Clinton weighs in on Keystone XL pipeline I was just wondering this myself! I think she has a few pounds over any little pipeline, but that's just my opinion....
5 posted on
06/17/2014 5:08:40 AM PDT by
C210N
(When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
To: thackney
7 posted on
06/17/2014 5:11:17 AM PDT by
Williams
To: thackney
Isn’t it helpful that SHE doesn’t think Canada should care about it?
A Clinton specialty. Ignore reality and spread whatever brand of BS is helpful to her.
9 posted on
06/17/2014 5:16:10 AM PDT by
Williams
To: thackney
We already have a lot of pipelines that cross our border, Clinton said.
+++++++++
I hope she never finds out that remaining silent tends to improve public approval ratings.
Just keep pontificating on everything, old woman.
11 posted on
06/17/2014 5:19:54 AM PDT by
RetSignman
(MODERATE Islamist are not as extreme, they stop cutting just before the jugular vein.)
To: thackney
For the uninitiated in Clintonistaspeak, stories are planted to provide the Clintons and their sycophants with the ability to say, “We’ve already gone over that. It’s old news.” This covers topics such as cattle futures, Gennifer Flowers et al., zigzagging under sniper attack, and Whitewater. One of the corollaries is saying something on a subject that amounts to nothing in order to be able to say, “The President/First Lady/Senator/Secretary has already addressed that topic and has moved on.”
17 posted on
06/17/2014 5:30:58 AM PDT by
Dahoser
(Separation of church and state? No, we need separation of media and state.)
To: thackney
“It is, after all, one pipeline. We already have a lot of pipelines that cross our border,”
Which is another way of saying: “What difference does it make?”
18 posted on
06/17/2014 5:49:00 AM PDT by
odawg
To: thackney
She will position herself like any other Progressive Democrat. She will be for it before she will be against it.
If John Kerry can do it so can she. And being a woman she can change her mind without reproach ;)
19 posted on
06/17/2014 5:57:38 AM PDT by
sr4402
To: thackney
Remember that for years the Greenies tried to stop the Alaska Pipeline and were successful.
I said that when the Arabs have another oil embargo the pipeline would be built.
They embargoed the oil not long after and the Alaska Pipeline was rushed through over the weeping and wailing of the Greenies.
All the gloom and doom situations that the Greenies said would happen did not happen.
20 posted on
06/17/2014 5:58:41 AM PDT by
Ruy Dias de Bivar
(Sometimes you need more than seven rounds, Much more.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson