Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This was a gay rape case where consent wasn't given, but the judges apparently had other objectives.
1 posted on 06/16/2014 3:34:19 PM PDT by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: aimhigh

Activist judges - helping homosexual predators since 2003


2 posted on 06/16/2014 3:37:53 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aimhigh

Obama owning the Judges is a Death Sentence for the United States


3 posted on 06/16/2014 3:38:42 PM PDT by molson209 (Blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aimhigh

The prosecutor messed up by not charging rape or sexual assault in the first place.


4 posted on 06/16/2014 3:41:41 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aimhigh

Can I ask a stupid question? If this case involved rape, or force and assault, what does that have to do with a law regarding homosexuality??? H ow can you use a case of rape to overturn a law on homosexuality? What does one have to do with the other???


5 posted on 06/16/2014 3:42:26 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aimhigh

I really don’t know why any sane person would want to become president of this rapidly declining country whose moral moorings have long been severed.


6 posted on 06/16/2014 3:50:45 PM PDT by ScottinVA (If it doesn't include border security, it isn't "reform." It's called "amnesty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aimhigh

Gay rape is now okay according to the courts???


8 posted on 06/16/2014 3:56:31 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aimhigh

let’s start declaring these judges uncomstitutional and getting rid of them.

these laws existed far longer thn this latest libtard batch of commie progressives and some date back before the founding of the fedgov. weren’t tossed out then.


13 posted on 06/16/2014 4:44:12 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aimhigh
But he said the victim is not getting a fair result because the sex in the case he was prosecuting wasn't consensual. "He got attacked by another man and he had sex he didn't want to have," Jackson said. He said Alabama's sodomy law still applies in cases of forced sex.

So...if it wasn't consensual then why did they charge the man with a crime that outlawed consensual sex? Wasn't there an assault charge they could have gotten him with?

14 posted on 06/16/2014 4:51:20 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aimhigh

America’s biggest problem right now is that most of the judges are sexual deviants. They should be recusing themselves from this stuff and stick with their “pee pee” pumps under their black robes.


17 posted on 06/16/2014 6:12:22 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Obama's smidgens are coming home to roost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aimhigh

Didn’t know we had a law against homos. I thought homos were to be given preference in everything, just like everywhere else in Obamerica.


18 posted on 06/16/2014 8:07:00 PM PDT by backwoods-engineer (Blog: www.BackwoodsEngineer.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson