Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 2banana; ansel12

If the IA is even remotely competent (big “if” there), they changed their crypto fills once the radios were compromised.

However....

1) The radios are usable in “plain text” mode or whatever the equivalent is on these. That means you’re transmitting in the clear—no encryption, so use at your own risk.

2) Even if they have fills, usually these small squad/team radios only take Type I encryption, not the hefty Type III like our forces use in our vehicles or other, larger man-portable radios (RT1523, PRC-117F/G, etc). That means that, even if a group didn’t know the encryption, a halfway decent SIGINT crew could crack it without too much effort.

As recent events in Iraq go, this one is not a big deal at all.


46 posted on 06/16/2014 4:12:54 PM PDT by Future Snake Eater (CrossFit.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Future Snake Eater

To go back to my original post.

To: winoneforthegipper
“The Iraqi military would and should have changed their encryption keys after the equipment was lost, but new encryption could be emplaced by individuals with specific training and equipment.
If that becomes the case, the communications equipment would allow ISIS fighters to coordinate over greater distances without interference from adjacent enemy units.”
26 posted on 6/16/2014 1:52:55 PM by ansel12


47 posted on 06/16/2014 4:20:28 PM PDT by ansel12 ((Ted Cruz and Mike Lee-both of whom sit on the Senate Judiciary Comm as Ginsberg's importance fades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson