Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All

http://minerva.dtic.mil/

It is right in our face...

Funny how the committee members providing oversight on programs like this kinda went asleep...Or did they???


5 posted on 06/15/2014 5:12:04 AM PDT by stevie_d_64 (Will work for a new Kidney...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: stevie_d_64

It’s for the chil’run, Stevie.


6 posted on 06/15/2014 5:13:39 AM PDT by TADSLOS (The Event Horizon has come and gone. Buckle up and hang on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: stevie_d_64

The head of this group:
Dr. Daniel Y. Chiu
http://www.defense.gov/bios/biographydetail.aspx?biographyid=349

Is a “climate change” globalist:

Excerpts:

Prioritizing Climate Change for Policy Makers:

Dr. Daniel CHIU considered the 2010 Quadrennial Defense Review to be an acknowledgement by the US leadership of the existence of climate security risks. What the leadership needed now were risk-benefit scenarios as part of a decision making tool.

The Use of the Military in the Context of Climate Change:

Dr. CHIU, in response, referred to the analogy, arguing that “the rabbit is often very complex”. For the DoD it was a challenging task to strike a balance between reactive (traditional) and proactive (new) capabilities and operations that need to be properly and timely planned and executed. Thus, in a more complex, globalised and less predictable security environment “the rabbit needs to be shot with a shotgun” at times. Dr. Chiu also emphasised that assisting partners and allies in building capacities and facilitating deeper cooperation was a very important aspect of the responsibilities of the DoD in order to handle the increasing levels of complexity in security issues.

Future of NATO Operations in connection with Climate Change:

Dr. CHIU recommended to better align the planning requirements for operations (predominantly short-term) and resource management (predominantly long-term) and link the analytical data in order to optimise the use of assets and expensive resources. This included bringing planning processes of Allies together.

Conclusions:

Dr. CHIU concluded by arguing in favour of NATO becoming a facilitator of inter-disciplinary thinking and cross-cutting discussions that could help to change the mind-set and to raise the visibility of climate change security risks across a broad range of civil and military personnel.

Round Table on Climate Security Risks, March 21, 2012
NATO HQ, Brussels
http://www.e3g.org/docs/Summary_of_NATO_roundtable.pdf


11 posted on 06/15/2014 5:40:48 AM PDT by jacknhoo (Luke 12:51. Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson