Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OldSmaj

Agree completely, and the law supports us.
The common law ad coleum doctrine says that homeowners own the airspace above the land itself, as well as the land and what lies beneath.
If a drone loiters over my property—that’s too much like the book 1984, and the drone must die.


31 posted on 06/14/2014 6:44:29 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: tumblindice

“If a drone loiters over my property—that’s too much like the book 1984, and the drone must die.”

If it’s low enough, 00 out to do it. Out of range for that, a Savage 110 with good scope...in either 308 or 30-06.


49 posted on 06/14/2014 7:05:43 PM PDT by GGpaX4DumpedTea (I am a Tea Party descendant...steeped in the Constitutional Republic given to us by the Founders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: tumblindice
If I remember correctly from my flying days, the FAA required aircraft to maintain at least 1000’ elevation over the highest building, in a populated area. In sparsely populated areas, the aircraft must maintain at least 500’ separation from any building, vehicle, or person.

If the drone is in shotgun range, I'd say go for it.

PULL!!!

55 posted on 06/14/2014 7:16:17 PM PDT by MRadtke (Light a candle or curse the darkness?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson