Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cotton1706

Pete Sessions is better because he will lose a primary over amnesty. His state is being invaded. Ralph Hall lost to hardliner Ratcliffe, who seems like Kobach.

The incumbent RINOs in California are facing no primary challengers and getting away with it.

Tancredo and Steve King backed Mike Pence as the better choice over Boehner in 2007.

Right now King doesn’t think they should have the vote.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/06/12/Steve-King-Calls-on-Boehner-to-Delay-Elections-Have-We-Learned-Nothing-from-Cantor-Ouster


5 posted on 06/12/2014 4:37:47 PM PDT by ObamahatesPACoal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ObamahatesPACoal
Pete Sessions is better because he will lose a primary over amnesty.

Good point ObamahatesPACoal

9 posted on 06/12/2014 4:40:52 PM PDT by Principled (Obama: Unblemished by success.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: ObamahatesPACoal

If it is McCarthy or Sessions it is easily Sessions.

The amnesty supporters like Denham and Nunes are for McCarthy. Nunes said Bachmann and King are not conservative.

IF Joe Heck and Amodei(NV) are for McCarthy that is another bad sign.

McCarthy and Gowdy will never lose a primary. It is a good thing that it was Cantor before McCarthy.

Jim Jordan in theory could lose a primary one day if he decided to sell out.


17 posted on 06/12/2014 4:51:50 PM PDT by ObamahatesPACoal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson