Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

Well, actually, he’s still a man. I don’t know why mutilation should be grounds for the state to force a separation on them, if they are willing to put up with it.

Not a good thing to do, but no point in making things even worse.


4 posted on 06/12/2014 3:46:24 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cicero

Yeah, I am with you on all points. This transgender business is a mass psychosis. The guy is a tranvestite eunuch. He is not a woman anymore than someone stuffing his hand in his coat is Napoleon.


10 posted on 06/12/2014 3:52:12 PM PDT by Psalm 144 (FIGHT! FIGHT! SEVERE CONSERVATIVE AND THE WILD RIGHT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero
He may still be a man biologically, but if the courts stupidly allowed him to be declared a woman legally, then he should be forced to get a divorce.

Either that or forced to declare himself as a man with severe self-inflicted physical deformations.

14 posted on 06/12/2014 3:57:00 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero

I think you have it right. He’s still a man, just as he would be if he had both legs amputated. She’s still a woman. If they don’t want to split up, what’s the government’s point in making them?


15 posted on 06/12/2014 3:57:06 PM PDT by Tax-chick (When the truth finally dawns, it dawns in fire!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero

I agree. He’s a mutilated male, a fauxfem. Still a guy.


19 posted on 06/12/2014 4:08:03 PM PDT by NewHampshireDuo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson