To: PapaNew
Bush's reason were convoluted and confused. The WMD thing was dropped like hot potatoes and changed to the equally screwy, anti-American "Bush Doctrine" justifying our invasion to make other countries "democratic." What a load of H.S. It was only 'convoluted and confused' if you were getting your news from MSNBC or Ron Paul - the 'WMD thing' you casually dismiss was taken quite seriously by the Democrats in the House and Senate, and most other other national and international intelligence agencies.
21 posted on
06/12/2014 3:06:48 PM PDT by
AzSteven
("War is less costly than servitude, the choice is always between Verdun and Dachau." Jean Dutourd)
To: AzSteven
There was a lot of debate about the existence of WMD's. And there was also a lot of debate about WMD's justifying an invasion.
Why did Bush early on, replace the WMD's for the "Bush Doctrine" as justification for invasion?
24 posted on
06/12/2014 3:15:13 PM PDT by
PapaNew
To: AzSteven
It was only 'convoluted and confused' if you were getting your news from MSNBC or Ron Paul ![](http://i1319.photobucket.com/albums/t667/jrrtknight/HouseSadNod_zpsc7eb13eb.gif?t=1384370426)
27 posted on
06/12/2014 3:17:25 PM PDT by
Old Sarge
(TINVOWOOT: There Is No Voting Our Way Out Of This)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson