Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Olog-hai
"a Romney campaign fundraising machine that raised more money than any Republican campaign in history.

Romney was the first nominee in history to win hugely among the independents, yet lose the race, and he did it in an election that republicans couldn't lose.

— "Romney first to win independents big, lose election"

— "Whoever wins independent voters in Ohio, wins Ohio,"Beeson said on “Fox News Sunday,” two days before the election.
He was, of course, wrong. Romney won self-identified
Independents in Ohio by a overwhelming 10 points, according to exit polls, but lost the state to President Barack Obama by 2 points.
A similar trend was seen across much of the country — Romney won among Independents by 5 points, 50-45, but lost to Obama, 51-48."

— "INFOGRAPHIC: Obama Lost Independent Vote In Almost Every Swing State
The president only won the independent vote in one battleground state: North Carolina."

"Things looked very different for Obama in 2008, when independent voters came out in huge numbers to support him. Just before Election Day, the Wall Street Journal reported those polling numbers had hardly changed, with Romney overwhelmingly leading among independent voters across the country. Republican pollster Bill McInteruff told the Journal the Democrats were “really flirting with trouble if you’re losing independents by this margin."

6 posted on 06/12/2014 1:11:14 AM PDT by ansel12 ((Ted Cruz and Mike Lee-both of whom sit on the Senate Judiciary Comm as Ginsberg's importance fades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ansel12

Obama is God’s judgement. Romney could not have won that election, I am convinced.


14 posted on 06/12/2014 4:10:59 AM PDT by Phillyred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson