Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: P-Marlowe
"If a child is born a Citizen of the United States and meets the other qualifications of age and residency, then he is eligible to be elected to the Office of the President of the United States. Period."

If that were the case, the Founders would not have bothered to change the original proposed presidential eligibility requirement of 'born a Citizen' to 'natural born Citizen'.

Natural law is clear about who is a natural born Citizen - those born in the country to Citizen parents.

The Laws of Nature and of Nature's God: The True Foundation of American Law

88 posted on 06/12/2014 8:25:27 AM PDT by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]


To: Godebert

You might want to wish that were true, but British law had long been accepting the dual sources of citizenship: location or blood. The children born overseas to British citizens were themselves British citizens.

It is from this that our own law is derived.

Representative Burke in the Congressional minutes regarding naturalization in the original, very first Congress: “The case of the children of American parents born abroad ought to be provided for, as was done in the case of English parents, in the 12th year of William III. There are several other cases that ought to be likewise attended to.”

Representative Hartley in those same minutes: “he had another clause ready to present, providing for the children of American citizens, born out of the United States.”


105 posted on 06/12/2014 9:26:42 AM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson