Boehner needs to either step up and fight this tyranny in earnest, or step down.
Norquist also supports terrorist organizations,
Sharia, and probably al Qaeda.
The GOP would be wise to ignore him.
So, I didn’t see any conservative mentioned in that article…...
Who the hell is Grover Norquist?
Americans are fair. They want the country secure against the invaders before we let the immigrants in, in an orderly legal process (not an invasion, Mr Obama).
We desperately need immigration reform.
Immigration reform is not necessarily amnesty, it’s coming up with a way to deal with the 35+million illegal aliens we have currently residing in the US.
It’s a big problem when a country with a population of 320 million people has an illegal alien population of more than 35 million.
More than 1 in 10 of the people currently residing within the borders of the United States is has entered the country illegally and is an illegal alien living here illegally
The thought that crossed my mind was that a vindictive Cantor could now push harder to get amnesty passed
Grover Al Norquist is as much of a threat as any of the democrat’s friends.
Which of his many stances is this referring to?
Grover is a long-festering pox on the conservative body politic.
norquist is no conservative.
Two days ago every pundit and pol was saying this election was a referendum on Amnesty. They were saying that if Cantor’s “margin of victory” was small it would be the death knell for amnesty. Surprise, surprise.
Saying Norquist a prominent conservative is like saying Obama a model centrist ......
Nuff said.
i.e. the spin will continue.
There are several different ways in which the direction of immigration reform may follow.
The simplest, but not necessarily easiest, is to simply annex Mexico, much like Puerto Rico. The border may then be freely crossed, both directions, and the authority of the US Military to move against the drug cartels is much expedited. A few drone attacks and coordinated raids on their strongholds should sufficiently break the cartels’ influence, to the degree that it will be safe to live in Mexico again.
First, make the ironclad requirement that English becomes the legal and only accepted language in law and commerce of the United States. Mexicans then become US subjects, not citizens, so long as they remain in Mexico. Crossing the frontier from the annexed lands to the incorporated and recognized states within the United States, changes their status from subject to citizen, but unless they are sufficiently fluent in English language to converse freely, there shall remain many doors closed to them, in employment, in applying for benefits, or in daily commerce.
As the various existing subdivisions within Mexico become fluent in English, adopting it as the official language, and change their code of laws to conform with the US Code and those of the existing 50 states of the United States, they may apply for statehood in their own right.
Another way would be to restrict legal immigration only to those who can bring something to the table that will benefit the US, in terms of education, expertise in some desirable field of enterprise, or capability of full self-support. Other visitors to the US who do not expect to be permanent residents or engage on a path to citizenship, would be regulated and compelled to register their presence at all times while within this country, and show they have the means for returning to their homeland or other destination when their visitation period has expired. This would involve much more scrutiny of those who actually enter the country, and holding in a facility to review their status on an individual basis, before release.
Those who come to America, expecting to gain citizenship, have the duty and responsibility to become Americans. Should they choose NOT to make the emotional and intellectual changes to conform to the principles of the American Ideal, they may return to wherever they came from, or to whatever locality will accept their divergent views.
Grover Norquist is Not a conservative.
Grover Norquist’s troubling ties to Islamic supremacists and jihadists have been known for years. He and his Palestinian wife, Samah Alrayyes, who was director of communications for his Islamic Free Market Institute until they married in 2005, are very active in “Muslim outreach.” Just six weeks after 9/11, The New Republic ran an expose explaining how Norquist arranged for George W. Bush to meet with fifteen Islamic supremacists at the White House on September 26, 2001 .
Frank Gaffney prepared a dossier on Norquist and Suhail Khan, The article is titled “A Jihadist in the Heart of the Conservative Movement.”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2993181/posts
Sorry Sistah, if you are backing Amnesty (Comprehensive Immigration Reform) you ain’t a conservative.
Boehner needs to go, Period. Is it redundant to put a period after you write “period”? Anyway, Boehner is and has been in the way. If he does do anything that resembles fighting, it will be a show. His goals are the same as 0’s: to strip us of liberty.
Hey Grover, it was about amnesty and nothing but amnesty.
Despite being outspent at least 10 to 1 Brat won by 11 percent!
Brat made it about Cantor’s amnesty and Brat won. At Cantor’s concession speech his supporters were screaming “What do we want? Immigration reform! When do we want it? Now!”
Amnesty LOST.
ENFORCE THE EXISTING LAWS ALREADY!