Here amnesty position is not on Sarahpac and I had trouble finding anything real recent.
Here’s what I found on Huffpo just recently:
Either unaware or unsatisfied by those developments on border security, Palin wrote that giving undocumented immigrants a path to citizenship would only help further “bankrupt” the government. The Congressional Budget Office has predicted the bill would reduce the deficit by about $200 billion over the next 10 years and by about $700 billion over the following decade, but Palin cites a highly controversial Heritage Foundation report that claimed immigrants would provide no net economic benefits, and would only cost the nation by drawing from entitlement programs.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/24/sarah-palin-immigration-reform_n_3491111.html
Then this was on Breitbart:
Palin also contrasted Maness with the more liberal Republican running to replace Landrieu, as Breitbart News reported:
She hailed Maness, who has wrestled an alligator in a campaign commercial, as a “true conservative” for “opposing amnesty, pledging to protect our Second Amendment rights, and promising to defund Obamacare.”
Thank you leapfrog, sounds closer to what I’ve heard her express vocally.
The question is how does she define amnesty. A path to citizenship is not necessary for an amnesty. Obama and McCain are against amnesty. They say if you pay a fine, learn English, and get to the back of the line, that is not amnesty.