do your own homework. all this was discussed when 0bama ran in 2008 and 2012.
the reasons 0bama wasn’t/isn’t eligible are the same reasons TCruz is not eligible. both were born with dual citizenships which immediately disqualifies them.
it’s very simple:
a natural born citizen is a citizen naturally... AS THERE ARE NO ALTERNATIVES.
both 0bama and TCruz had alternatives at birth, making them citizens of 2 countries but not a natural born citizen of either.
Regrettably, you simply don't understand American citizenship law.
The two cases are not the same. And Ted Cruz' is an open-and-shut one -- he IS eligible.
it’s very simple:
You're right; it is.
a natural born citizen is a citizen naturally... AS THERE ARE NO ALTERNATIVES.
A citizen-at-birth is a natural born citizen. There is no alterative.
Ted Cruz was a citizen-at-birth. Whatever Canadian citizenship law might be has no bearing whatsoever on his American citizenship.
You really need to read up on the subject....
There are plenty of natural born citizens who have or had alternatives. Your statement is irrelevant. There are plenty of ways a natural born American might be eligible to be a citizen of another county.
http://www.inis.gov.ie/en/INIS/Pages/WP11000024
http://icapbridging2worlds.com/
http://www.kanada.diplo.de/Vertretung/kanada/en/02/citizenship/determining__citizenship.html
http://www.ehow.com/info_8285551_russian-citizenship-requirements.html
http://www.citizenship.gov.au/applying/how_to_apply/descent/
Bottom line: Neither being born a dual citizen nor being eligible to be one has any bearing on one's natural born status in the US. To believe otherwise is to cede US sovereignty to the furriners who write those bizarre laws and funny web pages!