Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RB156

South Carolina was a state wide vote (senator) compared to Cantor’s seat which had a whopping 65,000 total votes for the Representative seat. Also, Cantor only had one challenger - Brat; Graham had six.

I haven’t heard Graham push the amnesty/illegal stuff lately; I think Cantor has been talking about the Dream Act.

Those are some reasons I see. It’s a shame there wasn’t one challenger to Graham.....he might have been able to gain some traction with the right support.


173 posted on 06/10/2014 6:48:37 PM PDT by Girlene (Hey NSA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies ]


To: Girlene

So Graham was smart enough to back off his support of amnesty just in time for the primary whereas Cantor wasn’t? I suppose that makes sense, but I wish voters had longer memories! McCain went right back to his RINO antics after winning his primary despite talking like a solid conservative during it, I expect the same from Linda.


176 posted on 06/10/2014 6:53:15 PM PDT by RB156
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

To: Girlene
Those are some reasons I see. It’s a shame there wasn’t one challenger to Graham.....he might have been able to gain some traction with the right support.

Six people were challenging Grahmensty. I fear there are several phony tea party groups that threw money at candidates to split the vote.

Also as Laura Ingraham pointed out on Megyn Kelly's show that unlike Cantor, Graham took the election seriously, tried pivoting to the base. Whereas, Cantor ignored the folks in his district.

217 posted on 06/10/2014 8:37:48 PM PDT by hockeyfan44 (No more RINOS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson