To: Resettozero
Why do you persist in posting to me as if I'm voting tomorrow for Nancy Mace? Because you have well earned that distinction with your persistent postings of many varied apologias and advocacy of dear Nancy ever since this Senatorial campaign started.
I would point to an earlier thread as Exhibit A, but alas, it has been deleted at your request.
To: Servant of the Cross
Because you have well earned that distinction with your persistent postings of many varied apologias and advocacy of dear Nancy ever since this Senatorial campaign started.
Well, that was true until a month ago when I found better reasons to support Richard Cash instead. On this thread, I have repeated my intention to vote tomorrow for Richard Cash.
I just heard Richard Cash on the phone on the Bobby Mack show and am more convinced than ever that Richard Cash is my candidate for tomorrow.
And yet, the points Nancy Mace raised in the most recent radio ad against Lindsey Graham are true, valid, well-known in the Upstate, and provable matters of record -- vis a vis Lee Bright's debts.
To: Servant of the Cross
Because you have well earned that distinction with your persistent postings of many varied apologias and advocacy of dear Nancy ever since this Senatorial campaign started.
Well, that was true until a month ago when I found better reasons to support Richard Cash instead. On this thread, I have repeated my intention to vote tomorrow for Richard Cash.
I just heard Richard Cash on the phone on the Bobby Mack show and am more convinced than ever that Richard Cash is my candidate for tomorrow.
And yet, the points Nancy Mace raised in the most recent radio ad against Lindsey Graham are true, valid, well-known in the Upstate, and provable matters of record -- vis a vis Lee Bright's debts.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson