Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee

This is not an argument for allowing abortion, so please don’t read it that way. However, in terms of the rape, incest, life of the mother position on abortion, I want to take issue with the “incest” part of that equation. It doesn’t really belong as part of the discussion.

The only incest that should matter would be if we were talking about a rape. If we’re talking about adults making a decision to copulate, then it really doesn’t matter if they’re related. It’s not like relatives are more likely to be ignorant of the facts of life.

So, if it’s willing sex between relatives, then it should be no excuse for ending a baby’s life.

If it is rape, one relative imposing him/her self on another relative, then it falls under rape and not under incest.

So, those of you who follow the rape/incest/life of mother dictum, please drop incest from the equation. Your argument really should be rape/life of mother.


6 posted on 06/09/2014 6:50:51 AM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: xzins

I’ve made that point, as well. Incest is either rape - forcible or statutory - or it’s legal, consensual sex.


8 posted on 06/09/2014 7:13:54 AM PDT by Tax-chick (When the truth finally dawns, it dawns in fire!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson