Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

.....

Lapid called for a construction freeze outside the so-called “settlement blocs”, saying, ''There is no reason to continue to build settlements in areas that will not remain a part of Israel in any future agreement, or to invest billions in infrastructure which will eventually be given to the Palestinians. I'd rather spend the money on improving the lives of Israeli children, not improving the lives of Palestinian children.”

.....

Quite right. So don't give them to the Palestinians, and don't sign a future agreement removing territory from Israel, not that any will ever materialize. What a moron.

1 posted on 06/08/2014 3:44:10 PM PDT by Eleutheria5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Eleutheria5
Quite right. So don't give them to the Palestinians, and don't sign a future agreement removing territory from Israel, not that any will ever materialize. What a moron.

But that will result in a future "Israel" with a majority of Palestinian inhabitants, exactly Lapid's point.

2 posted on 06/08/2014 4:15:06 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Eleutheria5

The enemy within. Sticking to the sabotage//suicide/surrender script no matter what outrages are hurled Against Israel, even to the point of throwing away Israel’s birthright and giving her key central highlands overlooking her cities to enemies sworn to annihilate her. Answer: retire, remove this person from government now. The last thing Israel needs are traitors ...........or complete idiots in Jerusalem.


3 posted on 06/08/2014 4:25:21 PM PDT by faithhopecharity ((Brilliant, Profound Tag Line Goes Here, just as soon as I can think of one..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume

If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.

..................

I could be mistaken, but if he topples the government, I think Israelis get to vote for a new one. As I understand the annexation plan, most of the areas annexed are populated by Jews. So it's not a question of spending money on palestinians. Though I don't disagree with Israeli children being the imperative for Israeli tax dollars. Were a politician to suggest American children be the beneficiaries of American tax dollars rather than illegal immigrants, he'd be deemed a racist.

5 posted on 06/09/2014 6:25:02 PM PDT by SJackson (wish I had known more firsthand about...problems of American businesspeople as a Senator G McGovern)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson