To: GeronL; 75thOVI; agrace; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; aristotleman; ...
Thanks GeronL. Good point. Also, the impact scenario requires that about 50 percent of the original lunar material comes from the impactor -- and since there's a supposed match with (for example) oxygen isotopes of Earth rocks and Moon rocks, either the surface was disproportionately made up of Earth material, or the impactor had a similar ratio. And if the latter is the case, there *is* no evidence for impact. Ta dah! I'd link to the old topic about this question, but it's past my bedtime.
Thanks .
66 posted on
06/05/2014 8:37:12 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: SunkenCiv
67 posted on
06/05/2014 8:40:08 PM PDT by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
To: SunkenCiv
That issue is discussed in the article.
68 posted on
06/05/2014 11:56:46 PM PDT by
Natufian
(t)
To: SunkenCiv
We have a sample of maybe 100lbs out of 7.35e22 kg of moon stuff. Pretty hard to say anything definitive about a sample as minuscule as that.
75 posted on
06/06/2014 8:06:30 AM PDT by
DManA
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson