Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tea Party Forces A Runoff in Mississippi: McDaniel and Cochran fail to win a majority
National Review ^ | 06/04/2014 | Eliana Johnson

Posted on 06/04/2014 6:39:07 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

It’s the scenario that Republicans on both sides of Mississippi’s hard-fought primary battle had hoped to avoid: Neither candidate in Tuesday’s primary captured 50 percent of the vote, sending the race into a June 24 runoff election.

It was a virtually unknown candidate, real-estate broker Thomas Carey of Hernando, Miss., who determined the outcome: With 99.5 percent of precincts reporting, he had captured 1.6 percent of the vote, keeping both incumbent senator Thad Cochran, with 48.8 percent, and his insurgent challenger, state senator Chris McDaniel, with 49.6 percent, under the 50 percent margin required to seize victory. Into the wee hours of the morning, Cochran advisers were predicting the senator will wind up with a lead when the last votes are counted. Regardless, it won’t be enough to push him over the 50 percent mark.

A runoff election gives McDaniel a second chance to pick off the 76-year-old Cochran. He has the wind at his back: Turnout in runoff elections is historically low and tends to favor challengers, whose supporters tend to be more motivated.

That’s why, when McDaniel addressed his supporters in Hattiesburg, Miss., shortly after midnight Wednesday, he delivered what could easily have been mistaken for a victory speech.

“Oh, my goodness, what a wonderful night,” he said. The state senator from Ellisville, Miss., a city of approximately 5,000, has cast himself as the true conservative in the race and sought to characterize Cochran as a historical relic, an appropriator and a compromiser who has proved unwilling to take the fight to President Obama.

McDaniel declared the outcome of the race a “historic moment in the state’s history.” Cochran, by contrast, did not appear to address his supporters.

National Republican groups must now decide whether to redouble their efforts on Cochran’s behalf and risk damaging McDaniel if he become the nominee in what has already been a highly personal race. The decision is made more agonizing by the fact that continuing to hammer McDaniel may have a high cost: Democrats recruited a potentially competitive nominee in the deep-red state, former representative Travis Childers, a pro-life, pro-gun legislator they believe can mount a credible campaign against McDaniel.

The outcome in Mississippi is unquestionably a victory for the GOP’s tea-party wing. Many have argued that the overarching narrative of the 2014 election cycle is of the Republican establishment vanquishing the Tea Party. The party’s insurgent forces, though, have put up a fight in only four major races: in Kentucky, where they tried and failed to unseat Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell; in Idaho, where they attempted unsuccessfully to oust representative Mike Simpson; in Nebraska, where they defeated the establishment-backed candidate, Shane Osborn; and in Mississippi, where McDaniel which a victory now hangs in the balance.

The 2014 cycle, says a top Republican strategist, is “very comparable to previous cycles where the tea-party candidates win a relatively small number of races, which is what they’ve always done in very tough primaries.”

But McDaniel strikes fear in the Republican establishment and even among some of his supporters because he is relatively untested; comments unearthed from his time as a radio talk-show host evoked the specter of failed candidacies in winnable races, like those of Todd Akin in Missouri and Richard Mourdock in Indiana. In one exchange, McDaniel discussed the possibility of paying reparations to the descendants of slaves. “If they pass reparations, and my taxes are going up, I ain’t paying taxes,” he said, and urged listeners to move to Mexico. “You know, a dollar bill can buy a mansion in Mexico.”

The McDaniel campaign suffered a major setback — and exacerbated those reservations — when a McDaniel supporter was arrested last month for breaking into the nursing home of Cochran’s bedridden wife in an attempt to produce a hit video on the senator. Three others have since been indicted in connection with the incident.

In the closing weeks of the campaign, though, and despite the Cochran camp’s attempts to tie him to the scandal, McDaniel rebounded.

If he emerges victorious later this month, he will have accomplished a feat that hasn’t been performed in Mississippi in over six decades: defeating a sitting senator running for reelection. That last happened in the Democratic primary of 1942, when James Eastland defeated Wall Doxey, who had served in the Senate for just two years.

Picking off Cochran, who has served in the Senate for 38 years, would certainly be a more impressive accomplishment. If McDaniel pulls it off, he can thank an influx of money from outside groups that marked Cochran as the most vulnerable establishment-GOP incumbent. McDaniel received over $5.2 million from groups like the Club for Growth and the Senate Conservatives Fund, compared with approximately $238,000 in individual contributions, a ratio of more than 20 to one. Cochran also received support from out-of-state groups: Organizations such as the National Association of Realtors and the American Hospital Association spent over $2.7 million to support him, while he raised nearly $700,000 from individual donors. Cochran’s ratio of out-of-state to in-state money was far lower — approximately four to one — but more than a third of Cochran’s individual contributions came from registered lobbyists in the Washington, D.C., area, including those employed by the liberal Podesta Group, according to data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics in late February.

Cochran created his own problems, too, frustrating national Republicans last year by wringing his hands over whether to retire and surprising many in the Republican establishment when he announced in late December, two months after McDaniel announced his campaign, that he would seek reelection to a seventh term.

“I don’t think Cochran was as prepared for this challenge as other incumbents who have dealt with similar challenges. He didn’t have a lot of money or a real campaign infrastructure,” says a strategist for the McDaniel campaign. Mississippi heavyweights like former governor Haley Barbour and his sons, Austin and Henry; the state’s current governor, Phil Bryant; and former Senate majority leader Trent Lott all stepped in to boost Cochran.

Cochran supporters worked to turn out Democratic voters, placing an ad in a Jackson-based newspaper with a largely African-American readership. (That strategy is limited in the next three weeks because Mississippi election law forbids anybody who voted in Tuesday’s Democratic primary from voting in the runoff election of the opposite party.) In the end, though, even his strongest backers were expressing reservations.

“Senator Cochran has a small lead, but the McDaniel supporters are absolutely going to turn out to vote,” Henry Barbour wrote in an e-mail to supporters on Friday. “I worry that too many Cochran voters think he has it in the bag. That is not the case. A low-turnout election would spell defeat for Senator Cochran.”

In the runoff later this month, the turnout will be low indeed, and both sides are preparing for the fight. “We grew up on runoffs in Ms. This will be fun. Let’s go,” Cochran adviser Stuart Stevens said in a tweet. McDaniel assured his supporters, “Whether it’s tonight, whether it’s tomorrow, we will stand victorious in this race.”

— Eliana Johnson is a political reporter for National Review Online.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Mississippi
KEYWORDS: chrismcdaniel; mcdaniel; mississippi; senateraces; teaparty; teapartyrebellion; thadcochran
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: onyx

I had not seen that. Thanks for the ping to it onyx.


41 posted on 06/04/2014 10:50:36 AM PDT by houeto (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Cochran, by contrast, did not appear to address his supporters.

What, and interrupt his Matlock marathon?

42 posted on 06/04/2014 10:51:46 AM PDT by Iced Tea Party
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire

I heard on Rush thad reintroduced himself to a reporter 30 minutes after an interview


43 posted on 06/04/2014 10:55:27 AM PDT by WKB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: WKB

Gads! The GOPe needs to back down from this cliff.


44 posted on 06/04/2014 10:57:18 AM PDT by penelopesire (TIME FOR OBAMA TO ANSWER FOR BENGHAZI UNDER OATH!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: WKB
I heard on Rush thad reintroduced himself to a reporter 30 minutes after an interview

That's what happens when he stays awake that long without his nap.

45 posted on 06/04/2014 11:12:21 AM PDT by Iced Tea Party (Libertarians are essentially what the Republicans were 30 years ago. --Drew Carey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
A runoff election gives McDaniel a second chance to pick off the 76-year-old Cochran. He has the wind at his back: Turnout in runoff elections is historically low and tends to favor challengers, whose supporters tend to be more motivated.

I think there is probably a great deal of truth in this observation; so I would favor McDaniel in the runoff election.

In many states, it would probably be a safer bet to go with the establishment conservative, in order to win the necessary swing votes. (After all, merely winning a primary is a phyrric victory if one cannot win the general election.) However, Mississippi is a deep red state; so I doubt that the Democratic challenger will prevail, in November, against either Cochran or McDaniel.

46 posted on 06/04/2014 11:20:37 AM PDT by AmericanExceptionalist (Democrats believe in discussing the full spectrum of ideas, all the way from far left to center-left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanExceptionalist

Rabid RATS will go out and vote for Thad. And they will bus in their inner city and plantation voters. I say this based on one friend who pushed voting for Thad in the last few weeks. He and his liberal private school supporting pals will go all out now. They don’t have anything else to do.


47 posted on 06/04/2014 11:25:16 AM PDT by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes

Yes....I realize that MS is an open primary and that Democrat thugs will urge their vermin voters to support Cochran in the run-off......but supporting and voting for Cochran does the Democrat low life no good whatsoever, other then possibly besting a conservative. If Cochran wins the run-off , he will suely hold the Senate seat for the Pubbies.....even though he is “Turncoat” Obamabot RINO!!!

Bottom line.....Chris McDaniel must go after every single conservative vote at a 24/7 “breakneck” pace!!! It is as simple as that. And......the Republican leadership better give McDamiel “all’ the support he will need!!! If Cochran had half a brain.....he would concede to McDaniel and withdraw from the race today!!! MS McDaniel voters....turn out in record numbers and get everyone you know to go along with you!!! A massive win by Chris McDaniel can change the course of the American Republic to a positive outcome!!!


48 posted on 06/04/2014 11:33:10 AM PDT by JLAGRAYFOX ( My only objective is to defeat and destroy Obama & his Democrat Party, politically!!!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: JLAGRAYFOX

I wouldn’t put it past that old coot Cochran to go all bitter and refuse to endorse McDaniel in the general.


49 posted on 06/04/2014 11:34:44 AM PDT by kevao (Biblical Jesus: Give your money to the poor. Socialist Jesus: Give your neighbor's money to the poor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“Tea Party Forces A Runoff in Mississippi: McDaniel and Cochran fail to win a majority”

Headline wrong and misleading. The third candidate in the race forced the runoff as he got more votes than the differnce of the top wo candidates.


50 posted on 06/04/2014 11:38:56 AM PDT by Steven Scharf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Yes.


51 posted on 06/04/2014 11:56:43 AM PDT by duffee (NO poll tax, NO tax on firearms, ammunition or gun safes. NO gun free zones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: onyx

I used to follow this blog some years ago. They seemed to have their finger on the pulse, IMO.

http://yallpolitics.com/index.php

US Senate with 99.7% reporting (5 precincts left):

* Chris McDaniel - 49.5% with 153,586
* Thad Cochran - 48.9% with 151,669
* Thomas Carey - 1.5% with 4,803

- 1,899 separate McDaniel and Cochran. A runoff is increasingly likely.
- Travis Childers is the Democratic nomine (no surprise there).


52 posted on 06/04/2014 11:59:52 AM PDT by abb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: petitfour

Its’ my understanding that the runoff is limited only to those who voted in the Republican primary.


53 posted on 06/04/2014 12:34:28 PM PDT by Mygirlsmom (No Mo (zilla). I'm going to the Opera instead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Mygirlsmom

That would be good.


54 posted on 06/04/2014 12:35:10 PM PDT by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Iced Tea Party

Has he addressed them yet? He sent Gregg Harper out last night because he is so senile he can’t make a coherent sentence.


55 posted on 06/04/2014 1:07:59 PM PDT by Malichi (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

TC won’t have the Democrats voting for him this time, he will be crushed like Dewhurst was.


56 posted on 06/04/2014 1:19:50 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Was this from Twitter? It’s gone now. ...


57 posted on 06/04/2014 1:21:54 PM PDT by DrewsMum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Mygirlsmom
It's my understanding that the runoff is limited only to those who voted in the Republican primary.

No, only those who voted in the Democratic primary are excluded.

58 posted on 06/05/2014 5:29:33 PM PDT by Excuse_Me (Tagline for sale or rent; pithy saying only fifty cent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: who knows what evil?

Thad is apparently mentally challenged for his age.


59 posted on 09/03/2014 4:27:00 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson