Treason being defined as "a violation of allegiance to one's sovereign or to one's state".
The release of the enemy's high command in a sham exchange for an enemy sympathizer and collaborator over the objections the security apparatus of the USA displays a basic lack of allegiance by the POTUS to the United States of America.
All 57 of them.
.
.
Treason as defined by constitution:
Article III, Section 3, Clause 1
“Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.”
—
Fact: Obama armed al Qaeda in Libya to overthrow Gadaffi and in Benghazi Libya transfering arms through Turkey to Syria.
al Qaeda made an act of War against the US on 9-11-01 and killed 2,000 of our citizens. Is there any question about al Qaeda still being “at war” with US?
We did not declare War on al Qaeda, but we did defeat them in Afghanistan.
Now Obama releases the top Taliban (al Qaeda affiliates) in GTMO under a very questionable prisoner exchange.
Is this not enough? How many others should also be charged. This is the real issue here. The Treason against the US was not done solely by the POTUS.