Washington Post: Can we please cut it out with all of this anti-GMO asininity?

Hotair ^ | 06/03/2014 | Erika Johnsen

[Toddsterpatriot]

Come on Mase, admit it.

Anyone who knows more science than him, doesn't fall for the anti-science whining of the liberals like him, must work for Monsanto.

Interesting that 250 million Americans work for Monsanto, but there it is.

[Mase]

You are indeed sorry. Any guy without enough testicular fortitude to back up his statements is obviously in need of sympathy, and some testosterone. You’ve done so much research that you can’t even provide one example to support your idiocy. Let me know when you have the time to find some facts. In the meantime, keep running away, Nancy.

[Mase]

Economic illiteracy. Scientific illiteracy. It's all the same idiocy posted by the same windbags. You either must work for the Fed or Monsanto if you have any idea what you're talking about. I blame public education, but I'm sure there's more to the equation.

They are very good at running away when confronted, however. Lots of Nancy boys out there.

[Manly Warrior]

And, are any of these horizontal transfer helpful or harmful? Thought so.

Gene manipulation by scientists is worse than a virus attack on living organisms, the GM result of the lab are made to be viable cells, whereas God’s nature generally makes such changes fatal for cells (the cell is host for viral DNA replication, not much else), and at least injurious to the organism.

God did not make democrats, by the way. Adam did, and republicans, and communists etc... God made man in His likeness, then man fell from that state of grace, only to be returned thereto individually via the finished work of Christ on the cross, where my sin is forgiven in the body of the Son of God, and I am imputed His righteousness((not of my own, least any should boast)....

Best;

[sphinx]

And, are any of these horizontal transfer helpful or harmful? Thought so

Some of both, I presume. In nature, mutations are random and there are innumerable failures for every beneficial mutation. Which is why doing it in a lab where the researchers are making precise, intentional changes is much more efficient, and much less likely to involve unanticipated results.

[Manly Warrior]

1. No mutation is beneficial. None have ever been demonstrated.
2. Scientists are not mutating, they are splicing,and often splicing material from different “kinds” (virus or amphibian to plant etc), not my concept of minimizing negative outcomes-they just do not know.

Anyway, eat all the frog-tomato you wish, If I do, it’ll be by accident, not intent (although frog’s legs and tomato’s are both are delicious!)
Anyway;