Fine. But you appear to be defending Bob despite clear demonstrations on Bob’s part of solidarity with Radical Islam.
His son is SAFE now. WTF is he continuing to advocate for the release of Gitmo enemy combatants? Not prisoners of war - ENEMY COMBATANTS under the Geneva Convention.
You’ve been a conservative FReeper in my experience. So WTF, dude? Why are you riding the brakes on Bob Bergdahl?
Yep. Why isn’t “bob” giving the Taliban the finger for capturing his son and holding him against his will for five years? (”allegedly”) Why isn’t he cursing and condemning the Taliban? Because he’s apparently batshit crazy for one thing, and probably a terrorist sympathizer.
“You’ve been a conservative FReeper in my experience. So WTF, dude? Why are you riding the brakes on Bob Bergdahl?”
I am very conservative.
I just think there’s a rush to judgment, here. Maybe not. I could be wrong. But since I am good friends with a man who is good friends with them I have an unusual interest in the whole thing.
The only reason I can come up with is that it’s part of some deal, he’s being handled, and while I can’t necessarily defend that I put it forward as a possibility.