And instead of making the false statement of
“sitting republican governor endorsed the dim”
Why don’t you tell the truth and say
“sitting republican governor lack of endorsement helps dim”
or
“Whitman’s late endorsement helps dim”
But no, you insist on telling the lie and then you try to defend the lie as “sort of like the truth”.
Just state the truth please.
The sitting GOPe governor VOTED for the dim.
Which part of that sentence is difficult to understand?
How many times are conservatives berated on this VERY board that unless we support whatever GOPe liberal dreck is running that we’ve elected the democrat?
How many times?
And yet when the sitting GOPe governor of the state of NJ not only failed to endorse the conservative candidate, but actually VOTED for the DIM, that’s OK or something?
How is failing to endorse, when you’re in the governor’s seat, anything but blatant support for the dim?
We’ve been told that many many many times. If you fail to lap up all the liberal dreck for McCainRomneyJeb, you’re as good as electing the dim? Hmmm?
Where was the GOPe ‘party unity’ when DiFrancesco failed to open his mouth and just mouth basic support for the primary winner?
Did you or anyone else thing that would be interpreted ANY other way?
Donnie VOTED for the dim. Why would he endorse Schundler?
As to WHY Donnie voted for the dim, read this book:
http://www.thesopranostate.com/
And why’d it take Christie Todd 4 months to endorse Schundler? According to the GOPe ‘party unity’ trolls that endorsement should have been IMMEDIATE. But it was NOT. Did Christie really vote for the dim too? Betchayourbippy her lib children did. Baby killing uber alles for Christie Todd and her kin.