Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kickass Conservative; Vanders9; TigersEye

PC cover was the only explanation that made sense.

Fortunately, I, in the privacy of my own home — oh, good morning Mr. NSA agent, want some coffee? — do not have such constraints.

For now ;-)


13 posted on 06/04/2014 5:09:38 AM PDT by cyn (Benghazi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: cyn; Kickass Conservative; Vanders9
She’s also looking forward to hearing what, if anything, Bergdahl will have to say. “I would like to know his side, because there is always two sides to every story,” she says. //

I have heard this "don't rush to judgment, wait until the facts are in, he deserves a trial" line from quite a few libs and even a few hand-wringing FReepers. The absurdity of that is that I haven't heard anyone on the right say that he shouldn't have a trial. In fact a court martial is exactly what most of us want to see. But as far as prejudging him? There are no mitigating facts on his side. None! And there are loads of witnesses against him who all agree.

That said; I also want to hear his side. I want to hear him speak, and soon, to see how much English he has forgotten. I want to read his medical reports from Landstuhl to see how sick he was. (since that was one of 0bama's excuses) I want to hear what he thinks of America now. (not that any change of heart will mitigate what he did)

14 posted on 06/04/2014 9:48:51 AM PDT by TigersEye ("No man left behind" means something different to 0bama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson