Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cynwoody; All
"Because, after all, non-experts such as Amendment10 shouldn't be talking incorrectly!"

Here's my Supreme Court-issued "license" to interpret the Constitution.

“3. The Constitution was written to be understood by the voters; its words and phrases were used in their normal and ordinary as distinguished from technical meaning; where the intention is clear, there is no room for construction and no excuse for interpolation or addition.” —United States v. Sprague, 1931.

152 posted on 06/01/2014 11:39:46 AM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]


To: Amendment10

Ah, but in Chuckie Schumer’s America, would that license be deemed valid under the rules duly issued by the Secretary of Political Discourse?


153 posted on 06/01/2014 11:43:43 AM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson