Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BOMBSHELL! SENATOR TED CRUZ SAYS THAT US SENATE VOTE WILL NEUTRALIZE FIRST AMENDMENT (VIDEO)
Now The End Begins ^ | May 31, 2014 | 1 Comments | NTEB NewsDesk

Posted on 05/31/2014 8:20:03 PM PDT by lbryce

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-163 next last
To: Amendment10
The point he was making, and it was quite clear to me, is that the Democrats in the Senate are beginning the process of attempting to amend the Constitution.

"What we wish, that we readily believe".

“What a man wishes he generally believes to be true”.

An objective observation of the given video seems to be innocuous to me.
101 posted on 05/31/2014 10:16:31 PM PDT by Pox (Good Night. I expect more respect tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Amendment10
So unless Reid is working with House RINO "leadership" on a bill to limit 1st Amendment protected speech, I don't know why Cruz seemed to be sounding alarm about a Senate vote.

41 senators want to repeal the First, and you don't find that alarming?

I find it something to be significantly pissed off about, even if it has no chance of ratification.

102 posted on 05/31/2014 10:17:51 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

The constitution has already been shredded. McCain Feingold was a blow to the first amendment. You have countless 2nd amendment violations every single day. The 4th. AHAHAHAHAHA. Thanks for the laugh on that one. 5th 6th all the bill of rights vaporized. What’s one more on more illegal unconstitutional law on the first amendment? Of course any law coming out of congress will exempt themselves, unions, and lobbyists. Heck, Obama’s internet czars already want mandatory internet IDs, as if that mattered with the NSA recording everything in the digital world.

“Embrace the suck? -Nasty Pelosi


103 posted on 05/31/2014 10:19:29 PM PDT by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody

I thought this had ALREADY gone through the SCOTUS so what the
heck are we talking about here!!!! I know Obammie POS hated the ruling
but can the Senate overturn a ruling from the SCOTUS?????


104 posted on 05/31/2014 10:22:32 PM PDT by Kit cat (OBummer must go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

!


105 posted on 05/31/2014 10:28:34 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass (The end move in politics is always to pick up a gun..0'Bathhouse/"Rustler" Reid? d8-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
the Constitution. It's not a difficult document, unless you let a lawyer read it.

LOL!

106 posted on 05/31/2014 10:38:24 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Pox; All
"... the Democrats in the Senate are beginning the process of attempting to amend the Constitution."

I had a look at the video again. "Shock jock" Cruz's first statement wrongly gives the impression that the Senate can act unilaterally to amend the Constitution imo, Cruz said to repeal the 1st Amendment. He didn't even bother to cover his arse by using word "effectively" in conjunction with repeal 1A in first statement.

Since only the states have the constitutional authority to ratify proposed amendments to the Constitution, Cruz is politicking imo, making a lasting impression as a Paul Revere, but also knowing that people will probably not remember video by 2016.

107 posted on 05/31/2014 10:39:39 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

I don’t think I’ve ever read a post of yours I disagreed with until now. They pull this off and we should have a war, taking out those who foisted this on us first. No mercy.


108 posted on 05/31/2014 10:40:01 PM PDT by scripter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kit cat
I thought this had ALREADY gone through the SCOTUS so what the
heck are we talking about here!!!! I know Obammie POS hated the ruling
but can the Senate overturn a ruling from the SCOTUS?????

What Senator Cruz discusses in the video is a proposal, backed by 41 'Rat senators, to amend the Constitution and thereby bypass the Supreme Court ruling. The idea being that not only your heart bypass but political speech shall be as the Secretary shall determine.

In order to become part of the Constitution, the proposed amendment would have to pass by a two-thirds majority in both the Senate and the House and be ratified by three fourths of the States' legislatures.

So, yeah. Not going to happen. But it's the thought that counts!

109 posted on 05/31/2014 10:47:38 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Amendment10

I think you’re right. Ted Cruz is throwing bombs trying to imply that good and honorable U.S. senators have bad intentions. There’s just no place for that kind of mud slinging in politics.


110 posted on 05/31/2014 10:52:22 PM PDT by TigersEye ("No man left behind" is more than an Army Ranger credo it's the character of America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
Ted Cruz is throwing bombs trying to imply that good and honorable U.S. senators have bad intentions.

Ted Cruz introduced convincing evidence that 41 of the 100 are evil.

111 posted on 05/31/2014 11:06:27 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: octex

IMO, Cruz wasn’t talking about a bill to actually change the First Amendment.

He is saying that Shumer’s bill relative to campaign finance reform will contain limitations on political speech, which would be a violation of the Freedom of Speech.
**********************************
I’m with you on this. I see it as a warning from Cruz that a stealth attack on the 1st Amendment will be disguised as “campaign finance reform.”

Cruz could have chosen his words more carefully, but then again, if he had stated it as succinctly as you just did, would we even be having this conversation? Probably not.

The stealth attack that I hear Cruz warning us about seems similar to how the 2nd Amendment is being attacked indirectly by every conceivable trick possible (ban on high-capacity magazines, IRS harassment of gun dealers, fed hoarding of ammo, etc.).

BTW, I can’t believe that no one replied to your response. It was a good one that is worthy of some conversation. (Must be all that good ol’ Texas blood coursing through your veins.;-)


112 posted on 05/31/2014 11:08:35 PM PDT by Nita Nupress ( Use your mind, not your emotions. Refuse to be manipulated by Marxists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: lbryce; killermosquito; tpmintx; TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig; Caipirabob; Clump; ColdOne; ...
Ted Cruz Ping!

If you want on/off this ping list, please let me know.

Please beware, this is a high-volume ping list!
113 posted on 05/31/2014 11:11:31 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody

Don’t be a hater. It has been proved that nothing bad will happen.


114 posted on 05/31/2014 11:11:34 PM PDT by TigersEye ("No man left behind" is more than an Army Ranger credo it's the character of America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: molson209

Welcome to the dictatorship of the Demonkrats.


115 posted on 05/31/2014 11:13:47 PM PDT by Busko (The only thing that is certain is that nothing is certain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Amendment10
The Constitution's Article V indicates that amendments to the Constitution actually have to be ratified by 3/4 of the states.

For someone who sets themselves up as some sort of expert on the Constitution, your knowledge is sorely lacking.

There is another path to amending the Constitution where both houses of Congress have to approve an amendment by 2/3's majority.

I think I'll take Senator Cruz's knowledge and understanding of the constitution over yours.

Stuff your disappointment.
116 posted on 05/31/2014 11:16:07 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie; Amendment10
There is another path to amending the Constitution where both houses of Congress have to approve an amendment by 2/3's majority.

And after that vote, THEN it is sent to the states for ratification.
117 posted on 05/31/2014 11:17:45 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
Those who talk, do not do. Those who do, do not talk.

I'm not talking.

118 posted on 05/31/2014 11:18:01 PM PDT by Lazamataz (Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: octex
IMO, Cruz wasn’t talking about a bill to actually change the First Amendment.

There is no such a thing as a bill to change the First Amendment. The only way the First Amendment can be changed is by ratifying a superseding amendment.

He is saying that Shumer’s bill relative to campaign finance reform will contain limitations on political speech, which would be a violation of the Freedom of Speech.

Upchuck's bill is not a normal bill. A normal bill to do what he wants would be unconstitutional. So, Chuckie proposes to fix that problem in the only way possible: by amending the Constitution. Apparently, 41 senators, including Dingy Harry, have signed on. That is what Cruz addresses in the video.

I think most commenters on this thread just saw the reference to an Amendment and misunderstood what Cruz meant.

No, that's exactly what Cruz meant! An amendment to the Constitution to give the Secretary of whatever the same power over your political speech that she has over your heart bypass surgery! After all, what do you know? You're not an expert!

Fortunately, the requirements to amend the Constitution are steep. But it's the thought that counts! We know who the traitors are!

119 posted on 05/31/2014 11:28:54 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Eddie01
Good news is we all have guns and no idea what to do with them.

Bad news is the Feds are buying up all the ammo and there's none left for us to buy.

120 posted on 05/31/2014 11:36:49 PM PDT by AlaskaErik (I served and protected my country for 31 years. Progressives spent that time trying to destroy it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-163 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson