To: nickcarraway
Unless I am much mistaken (and I’m not) it is against federal law to offer any reward for voting.
5 posted on
05/31/2014 4:02:17 PM PDT by
null and void
(Fascists never think they're fascists. They just think everybody should obey them.)
To: null and void
Law?
They don’ need no steenkin’ law!
7 posted on
05/31/2014 4:04:03 PM PDT by
RandallFlagg
(Uninstall Fascist Firefox. Get Pale Moon.)
To: null and void
It’s a municipal election. The feds can pound sand.
8 posted on
05/31/2014 4:04:23 PM PDT by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
To: null and void
“Unless I am much mistaken (and Im not) it is against federal law to offer any reward for voting.”
that’s absolutely correct. but I wonder if the law is payment before the vote. you could make a very good argument that if a person has already voted, this “payment” would not be about swaying someones vote.
To: null and void
Unless I am much mistaken (and Im not) it is against federal law to offer any reward for voting. It's also against Federal to posses or distribute marijuana for any reason.
18 posted on
05/31/2014 4:43:38 PM PDT by
ElkGroveDan
(My tagline is in the shop.)
To: null and void
against federal law to offer any reward for voting.
Depends on which party people are told to vote for. In Milwaukee they have been offered ciggs, chix dinners and lots of other things. BUT this is only allowed if it is done by Dims.
19 posted on
05/31/2014 5:03:06 PM PDT by
logic101.net
(How many more children must die on the altar of gun control?)
To: null and void
Laws? What Laws? We don’t need...
To: null and void
When I lived in Indiana, liquor stores were closed on election day.
I assume for that reason, so that politicians can't buy potential voters a drink.
29 posted on
05/31/2014 11:16:15 PM PDT by
boop
(I just wanted a President. But I got a rock.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson