[mac_truck]

No...RR was never under attack on that thread, Clinton and NAFTA were.

You chose to defend Clinton from criticism about NAFTA by offering Reagan as an alternative target.

I also notice you haven't answered my question about the lack of personal opinions, positions, or political affirmations in your posting history.

Whats up with that?

[1rudeboy]

If some protectionist attacks NAFTA by claiming it was Clinton's idea, I will continue to (correctly) point out that it was Reagan's idea.

Despite your rhetorical gymnastics, that does not make me a defender of Clinton but rather a defender of Reagan.