Replies

Actually I don’t do that at all,I deal with political disagreements and questions for sources, etc. but a personal attack is just a personal attack, and it is creepy to know that someone has deep personal feelings about you that they carry around to different threads.

So, when you talk to people in your life, do you expect them to treat every encounter with you as the first one?
That's a mental illness.

And no, you really don't discuss political disagreements -- I remember you berating people who were saying that the federal-government shouldn't be involved in defining marriage (around the DOMA/USSC decision), and [IIRC] you're pretty vehement against people who believe that the War on Drugs is illegitimate.

I can’t believe that both of your posts to me on this thread have been about your personal baggage and have no relevance to this thread or my posts on it, at all.
When I made post 4, I am perfectly willing to substantiate every claim made in it.

I have nothing to say about it — I was unaware about these particular events, but I know enough about Mitt to conclude that (a) he's a slimeball, and (b) it fits his character. (Obviously I knew he was crap on immigration, that's blindingly obvious.)

So, when you talk to people in your life, do you expect them to treat every encounter with you as the first one? That's a mental illness.

That is the rule at FR, you have accomplished nothing on this thread by dragging in your old grudges and past disagreements, your posts are ignoring this thread topic entirely while you express your emotional relationship to me.

You admit that you have nothing to say about post 4, "I have nothing to say about it — I was unaware about these particular events," you only want to talk about me and your feelings for me, do you see why FR doesn't want that kind of thing here?

You have admitted trolling in the past, and you are clearly doing it on this Romney thread.