Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GeronL
The idea that we should buy whatever France builds only means we are subsidizing their shipbuilding industry

Well, there's a difference - the U.S. says France to break the Russian contract, France doesn't want to pay the fines and the damages, so the U.S. may propose to pay the bills themselves.

9 posted on 05/30/2014 12:40:29 AM PDT by Freelance Warrior (A Russian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Freelance Warrior

“Well, there’s a difference - the U.S. says France to break the Russian contract, France doesn’t want to pay the fines and the damages, so the U.S. may propose to pay the bills themselves.”

France should not be liable for the payment of damages to Russia, because Russia’s grave violations of international law with the illegal occupation and annexation of the Ukrainian territory of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea have voided the terms of the contract under any force majeure provisions which are now in effect due to the Kellogg-Briand Pact 1928, the Budapest Memorandum 1934, and the Chrater of the United Nations.

India, Japan, Vietnam, and India could use some helicopter carriers.


10 posted on 05/30/2014 1:04:33 AM PDT by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson