Actually your “plan” never changes, we aren’t even in the primary yet and you continue with your never ending promotion of accepting liberal candidates.
That is your goal here, to oppose conservatism, settling isn’t a plea that you save for after the nomination.
Like I said - comprehension problem. I want conservative candidates. I know that the the odds of a "perfect" candidate are slim, but I remain hopeful. If there is a less-than perfect candidate running against another Obama or a Hillary, I will vote for that imperfect candidate because I'm smart enough to understand what happens when folks choose Satan because they don't have God on their slate.
I'm not promoting non-conservatives, but you seem incapable of understanding it and being able to look ahead.
BTW - you still haven't outlined your plan, yet you continue to misrepresent/misunderstand what i would do. It's really tiresome trying to discuss something with someone who appears to have a brain, but is only willing to use the "blinders-firmly-on-reality-not-allowed" portion of it.
Are you forgetful so that you keep omitting your plan? Do you have a plan that can be communicated? Do you have a plan that feels right to you, but which you know is a pipe-dream so you are embarrassed to put it out there? So far, your arguments resemble the Left-Wing/Alinsky style - they are great at attacking other's thought/opinions, but they always omit what theirs is and why theirs is really good. No rationale except in their own heads.