Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kennard

He could do a 1033 exchange whether or not it is a voluntary sale. It is, after all, income property, and you can always exchange it if the proceeds go into like property. It’s not the forced sale that is the issue.


35 posted on 05/29/2014 4:28:03 PM PDT by Benito Cereno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: Benito Cereno

Rush Limbaugh and his consortium should have put in a bid. I would have loved that conversation.


36 posted on 05/29/2014 4:29:58 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz ("Heck of a reset there, Hillary")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: Benito Cereno
He could do a 1033 exchange whether or not it is a voluntary sale. It is, after all, income property, and you can always exchange it if the proceeds go into like property. It’s not the forced sale that is the issue.

Qualifying as a section 1033 involuntary conversion would give Sterling more flexibility than a tax-free exchange under section 1031. A 1033 Exchange does not require the use of a qualified intermediary. 1031 Exchanges require the funds be placed with a neutral third party. Also Sterling could complete the exchange by making improvements in property he already owns, unlike a 1031 exchange that requires that he purchase a property.

37 posted on 05/29/2014 4:54:39 PM PDT by Praxeologue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson