Replies

Who exactly is "The Obama Cabal"?

Your links display how the Obama White House is infested with Communists. His past, of course, is also infested with the breed.

However, I believe there is more to the "Obama Cabal" than simply Communism. For example, I note two things:

a. In every case, Obama's foreign policy in the Middle East has been directed toward favoring the Muslim Brotherhood -- the faction that spawned radical Islamism. In Libya, in Egypt, in Tunisia, in Syria, etc. Even in Iran. In every friggin' case...

b. The Obama administration has been thoroughly and selectively infiltrated by active members of the Brotherhood. The State Department, famously, by Huma Abedin, et al. But, more generally, the various security services. The MB is deeply involved in the instruments of our foreign policy and national security. But try to find an Arab in the Department of Agriculture.

On the surface, Communists and radical Islamists are strange bedfellows. But their cooperation is totally consistent with an "enemy of my enemy is my friend" philosophy. And there is good reason for a relationship between the network of domestic Communists and the Islamists.

At one time, the domestic network of Communists was lavishly funded by the Soviet Union. But this pipeline of cash started drying up in the eighties. At about the same time, Muslim Brotherhood money and influence started showing up among the black activist minority -- which had already been recruited by the Communists for their purposes.

When the Wall went down, it became necessary for the Communists to join forces with the MB, in order to maintain their subversive activity.

The Communist subversives put their organization at the disposal of the MB subversives in return for funding. The deal they cut was: domestic policy belonged to the Reds, foreign policy belonged to the Islamists.

Despite Obama's flagging popularity, the cabal has an investment...and they have a goal: Bring the USA to its knees...via internal subversion. The question now is: How do they salvage their investment in Obama and retain power long enough (and strongly enough) to achieve their objective?

If Obama is of no further use, then...