To: Sherman Logan
Policy prior to the Dec. 29, 2010 directive is largely irrelevant. I assume the current policy is as stated in the Dec. 29, 2010 directive. Thaat's what matters. Unless I misread the article, it describes the 2010 policy.
38 posted on
05/28/2014 3:34:15 PM PDT by
foxfield
(Support the Tea Party. The Tea Party supports you.)
To: foxfield
The implication of the article, and certainly of most of the comments, is that this is a new policy implemented by Obama to justify military assaults on Americans.
If so, demonstrate that by showing how this is a change from previous policy.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson