It is not the fault of the Judiciary that the primary person (John McClain.) who should have filed a lawsuit did not do so. It is their fault that they did not fast walk lawsuits from other people instead of going down the "standing" slap down road.
It is entirely the fault of the Judiciary that the primary line of defense (Individual Secretaries of State) did not know what was the correct application of the law, and that it was their duty to enforce it. Thanks to over 100 years of misunderstanding the 14th amendment and the Wong Kim Ark ruling, the judiciary and the entire legal community bears much responsibility for the promulgation of this incorrect understanding of the law.
I can guarantee you that there is no judge in America who is going to rule favorably on a candidate eligibility challenge without the opposition candidate(s) as parties to the complaint.
When Judges don't want to rule a certain way, they can come up with an endless bounty of excuses as to why. When they DO want to rule a certain way, they just do it. Wasn't it Judge Mahili that ruled for the Defendant even though they didn't even bother to show up?
Rules and procedures are subjective nowadays. Judges indulge them at their whim.
The proof of what I am saying is that more than 500 judges (when counting multi-judge appeals court/state and federal supreme court panels) have had a chance to rule on Barack Obama’s eligibility and not one of them has ruled him to be ineligible.
And here you come again with that Fallacy of false authority argument. All you have here is 500 judges letting other judges think for them without a one of them starting from first principles. It was just like that disaster with the Thunderbirds. When the Lead pilot flew into the ground, the rest of them flew into the ground with him.
Courts have turned flying into the ground into an art form. This wouldn't be so much of a problem if they would do their own thinking and research instead of relying on bad interpretations of previous thinking.