For the manifesto and his YouTube rantings it's clear that although he got rid of his British accent, he didn't get rid of his britishisms. He would use words like 'exquisite' and 'quite' a lot more than most Americans would.
If he had kept his British accent he might have actually seemed cool to most Americans. But without the accent, his way of talking just sounded peculiar. It also might sound a bit like he was gay.
There is no way anyone should trust his manifesto, even though he begins it by claiming he will tell the whole truth. There are a number of important details we have learned about his life that are NOT in the manifesto. Whether he ever had any gay tendencies was not something he included in his manifesto.
Anyone who thinks that this guy was gay has pretty much got to believe that some people are born gay. Everything about his life, from what he claims in his manifesto, to what people have reported in the news, suggests there were no overtly gay influences in his life. He was not "recruited" or "turned".
If you think he was gay, then you probably believe all the unscientific and unsubstantiated crap that the gay lobby has been shoving at us about homosexuality being a genetic trait.
Because, with the exception of Winston Churchill, that accent is faggoty. Am I right?
I’m just teasing. The answer of course is, yes.
7 times you trashed the word for happy. He was not happy. He was a homosexual !
He was wrong to drop his Brit accent. Many women find that attractive, tho not as many as those who find a French accent attractive....
There are millions upon millions of homosexual men who were never “recruited” or “turned.”