Posted on 05/27/2014 5:30:15 PM PDT by Impala64ssa
Much of Elliot Rodger’s video and written manifestos pointed to a frustration over women not finding him attractive as motive for the killing spree he went on Friday night near UC Santa Barbara that left seven dead including himself. But according to one “expert” on Fox News this weekend, it was his “homosexual impulses” that may have driven him to kill.
Dr. Robi Ludwig, a psychotherapist and reality show host, said her theories about Rodger’s motives began to evolve the more she listened to his disturbing rants. “When I was first listening to him, I was like, ‘Oh, he’s angry with women for rejecting him,’” she told Fox’s Jeanine Pirro. “And then I started to have a different idea: Is this somebody who is trying to fight against his homosexual impulses?”
“Was he angry with women because they were taking away men from him?” she asked. “But this is a kid who couldn’t connect, and felt enraged, and wanted to obliterate anyone that made him feel like a nothing.” Seconds later, she added that even though she had never had a chance to diagnose him in person, she thought he might have had “early signs of schizophrenia.”
When Pirro pointed out that Rodger’s victims including men as well as women, Ludwig asked, “Was he angry at the men for not choosing him? This is a kid who was just angry in general and probably felt rejected, he couldn’t connect, he couldn’t feel loved, he couldn’t feel successful. Maybe he didn’t feel like a real man.”
Following those statements, Pirro wondered why, with all of the apparent problems Rodger had, his school did not do more to alert authorities of his potential for violence. She did not ask why he was able to legally purchase three handguns and
(Excerpt) Read more at mediaite.com ...
The post of mine that you responded to was about the shooter.
He wasn’t a doctor, but he was prime, A#1 gay bait.
Do you really think he never had sex with a homosexual?
My comment was about the doctor and her diagnosis.
I don’t know about the shooter. I am inclined to think he didn’t. His manifesto would have covered it, I think.
Then you picked the wrong post to post to.
There is no reason to think this guy would have written his shame and his deepest secret in his self serving letter, the guy was gay bait, in a gay world.
Do you really think his big sex issue was that he was wealthy, attractive, 22 years old, connected to Hollywood and on video at Hollywood events, a community of call girls, gays and even street hookers and loose high school and college girls, and somehow had never even kissed a girl?
You don’t think that a little bit is missing from his 9 or 10 years following puberty and living in his highly sexed, amoral, highly gay world?
It’s Hollywood, 2014. Saying he’s gay could have helped him be more attractive to women.
Everything else the doctor said is speculation.
I have no idea what you are struggling to get out, or why you are posting to me.
I know you don’t.
Then get someone to help you write something that makes sense, or is relevant.
Testy, huh?
No, I’m baffled at why you started posting to me and keep posting to me about nothing particular, or related to post 61, what do you want?
Spit it out.
I’m wondering the same about you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.