The following may or may not answer your question. It's from the syllabus:
Rickards outrageously reckless drivingwhich lasted more than five minutes, exceeded 100 miles per hour, and included the passing of more than two dozen other motoristsposed a grave public safety risk, and the record conclusively disproves that the chase was over when Rickards car came to a temporary standstill and officers began shooting.
...
Petitioners did not fire more shots than necessary to end the public safety risk. It makes sense that, if officers are justified in firing at a suspect in order to end a severe threat to public safety, they need not stop shooting until the threat has ended. Here, during the 10-second span when all the shots were fired, Rickard never abandoned his attempt to flee and eventually managed to drive away.
So he was driving that fast and reckless and the cops weren’t even chasing him?