Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hugin

Journalists and reporters who write for major newspapers, magazines, and broadcast news (tv & radio) have to answer to their editors and their organization’s legal team. While they have obviously manufactured evidence (CBS/Rather), there is some organizational structure in place to lessen the likelihood of manufactured confidential sources.

The same can’t be said of independent Internet bloggers. That doesn’t mean they shouldn’t be shielded; they should. Without editors and legal teams to review their claims, it is inherently easier for bloggers to manufacture confidential information.


6 posted on 05/27/2014 9:44:49 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: BuckeyeTexan
Without editors and legal teams to review their claims, it is inherently easier for bloggers to manufacture confidential information.

But that just goes to credibility. The blogger should have to earn the trust of readers before they should accept anonymous or confidential sources at face value.

8 posted on 05/27/2014 9:54:11 AM PDT by kevkrom (I'm not an unreasonable man... well, actually, I am. But hear me out anyway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson