Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CpnHook
"In the period leading up to drafting of the U.S. Constitution, there was no use in English of the term "natural born" where it meant "from like parents." As pointed out earlier on this thread, the first English translation of Vattel using "NBC" (instead of "indigenes") wasn't produced until a decade later."

Incorrect.

English Editions of the Law of Nations (1760,1787,1793,1797)

93 posted on 06/02/2014 7:38:36 PM PDT by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: Godebert
Me: "In the period leading up to drafting of the U.S. Constitution, there was no use in English of the term "natural born" where it meant "from like parents." As pointed out earlier on this thread, the first English translation of Vattel using "NBC" (instead of "indigenes") wasn't produced until a decade later."

You: Incorrect.

English Editions of the Law of Nations (1760,1787,1793,1797)

Nothing in that thread disproves my claim. The two reproductions of section 212 provided -- one from 1787 (Post #99) and one from 1796 (Post #125) -- both read "natives or indigenes." "Natural born citizen" is absent.

And the version you linked on your prior post which contains the phrase "natural born citizen" in section 212 is from the 1797 Edition! (The bit at the outset reading "Preface to the 1797 Edition" should have clued you in.)

So my claim stands.

95 posted on 06/03/2014 6:58:40 AM PDT by CpnHook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson