Even a layman can read the law.
And the judge could have ruled correctly, and Conyers will STILL win.
Even as a write-in. ASSUMING Conyers' constituents can write.
And a big ASSumption that is.
So no upside, and plenty of tyranny going on.
Why the corrupt POS judge had to stick their snout into this I have NO idea.
But - only republicans are subject to law -
I worked for Ross Perot when he ran for POTUS in NJ. Funny how the courts required the petitions to be properly bounded, header sheet and all signatures must be valid. Oh one more thing, better file it on time. When one of the Perot supporters complained, one judge reminded him that if you want to be in the big leagues, follow the rules. LOL!!!!
Wasn't getting an opponent thrown off the ballot the same way their hero BO got his start in politics?
conyers never had a problem obeying this law the last 24 times he ran for office.
This is why I laugh my ass off at those people who lecture us that our vote still counts.
If anyone bothered to notice, the rule of Law is DEAD in this country and the voice of the People will be determined by the Ruling Class.
If the politicians and the judiciary refuse to follow the law and make up what the law is to benefit the Beast, why do people still cling to the silly notion that our votes will count and that we can somehow stop tyranny at the ballot box???
In the back of my mind, I think this has to do with voters not being registered yet still voting....
Oh, they could spell it “Kawnyurs” and their votes would be accepted. Look at how Murkowski’s write-in was handled.
To project what they think is power over the states.