Skip to comments.
Will Conyers ruling be appealed? (Judge's ruling violated Michigan law)
The Hill ^
| 5-24-2014
| Mario Trujillo
Posted on 05/24/2014 8:44:45 PM PDT by smoothsailing
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 last
To: smoothsailing
The corruption of our legal system is now complete.
There are laws for you and laws for “them.”
41
posted on
05/25/2014 4:18:27 AM PDT
by
DH
(Once the tainted finger of government touches anything the rot begins)
To: Fee
When one of the Perot supporters complained, one judge reminded him that if you want to be in the big leagues, follow the rules. LOL!!!!
Unless you're name is Torrecelli or Lautenberg. :)
42
posted on
05/25/2014 4:58:32 AM PDT
by
KarenMarie
(NEVER believe anything coming out of DC until it's been denied.)
To: KarenMarie
There is no way Conyers should be on that ballot. IMO, the JUDGE needs to be prosecuted for making such a decision. Crazy!
43
posted on
05/25/2014 5:07:39 AM PDT
by
DaveA37
To: Mr. K
To: smoothsailing
Too Big to Break the law.
45
posted on
05/25/2014 8:02:30 AM PDT
by
Revel
To: smoothsailing
The judge noted that he hurried to file the injunction Friday to give all parties time to appeal, if necessary, to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals before the June 6 deadline to certify the ballot.Bull Sh--! The judge could have just as easily upheld the rule of law and ruled quickly against Conyers This would have given Conyers ample time to appeal. The judge is a liar.
46
posted on
05/25/2014 8:53:53 AM PDT
by
cpdiii
(Deckhand, Roughneck, Mud Man, Geologist, Pilot, Pharmacist THE CONSTITUTION IS WORTH DYING FOR!)
To: cpdiii
The SOS should just say that the judge wants her to disobey the law and she won’t do it, and call for the judge’s impeachment
47
posted on
05/25/2014 11:52:19 AM PDT
by
Mr. K
(If you like your constitution, you can keep it...Period. PALIN/CRUZ 2016)
To: Revel
As the judge said, because of Conyers' likelihood of success (by hook, crook, ballot-box stuffing, Democrats amok in the district), the state needs to find a less restrictive means to enforce its law than doing the obvious: keeping Conyers off the ballot, says Obama's appointee. Conyers is deemed too important to follow the law. If he can't follow the law, the law needs to be broken to let him win nonetheless, despite his contra-legal ways. It's Lautenberg all over again.
The judge needs to be impeached for not faithfully executing the law.
HF
48
posted on
05/25/2014 3:37:58 PM PDT
by
holden
To: smoothsailing
Conyers probably would win a write-in vote... except most of his constituents don’t know how to write. They only knows the buttons the Massa tells them to push (the ones with the “D” next to them).
49
posted on
05/25/2014 4:23:34 PM PDT
by
Gritty
(Climate hysterics shriek on. Loud and apocalyptic is the only setting on the machine.-Mark Steyn)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson