Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TwelveOfTwenty

Why defend Romney’s aggressive pro-homosexual agenda, with speculation and what ifs, and most people don’t know about his deep and enduring commitment to the homosexual agenda.

Most people don’t even know that he went back to being pro-abortion and running pro-abortion ads after he won the nomination.


27 posted on 05/25/2014 9:53:56 AM PDT by ansel12 ((Ted Cruz and Mike Lee-both of whom sit on the Senate Judiciary Comm as Ginsberg's importance fades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: ansel12
I'm not defending him, but the fact is it was either him or Obama. If you know of another outcome that was possible in November 2012, then please share it with us.

As I was saying at the time, we needed Romney to stop Obama, and a Conservative Congress to stop Romney.

This is why the libs are winning. They aren't all or nothing, but take their victories in small doses until they start winning big, as is happening with the homosexual agenda. Remember, Obama was "against" homosexual marriage, but they took what they could get. Now with Obama in his second term, it's homosexual marriage, full speed ahead.

Romney was no Conservative, and I spent plenty to beat him in the primaries, but we might have taken some ground back if he had won.

28 posted on 05/25/2014 1:17:57 PM PDT by TwelveOfTwenty (See my home page for some of my answers to the left's talking points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson