I was interested to hear that Mark Levin on his radio show two days ago has sent up a trial balloon to the same effect. Levin does not suggest that this should be done in all races against all Rino incumbents who prevail in primaries and win the nomination, but it should be done selectively to make a point.Not to belabor the point, but I think he was hinting at not voting for said establishment candidate. My tag line says it all, I have been so done with the establishment for way too long. It has been a divorce, I am just waiting for our side to move out... Sarah and Mark Levin are you lurking?...
http://therightscoop.com/mark-levin-what-if-we-picked-one-senate-race-in-the-general-election-and-said-dont-vote-for-this-rino/
Thank you for posting the transcript which confirms that Levin did not advocate running a third-party in opposition to Rino incumbents in selected races.
Levin leaves it in the air saying, " I don’t know why we shouldn’t educate these people and punch them back in the nose – pick one race and say you’re going to lose this race here. " Levin himself would be the first to ask, who is "we?" Does he mean his own microphone, does he mean conservatives in general?
This is why I think you need the vehicle of a third-party candidate. Policy and the person become one in politics, especially American politics and one needs a paladin to advance the argument against that Rino and make it clear that there is a coherent coordinated movement bringing him down for good and sound policy reasons.
