Replies

I would love to hear just when the hell some federal court actually DOES rule on some issue in favor of actually following the Constitution. I’m pretty damn sick of these jerks finding all this stuff in there that was never there.

The Constitution does not specify its moral foundation. This allows complete freedom to judges to make up their own morality as they render their judgements.

Of course, we've always seen SCOTUS decisions overturn prior SCOTUS decisions, even though this is logically inconsistent and reflects simple political bias or correctness at best. For example, if slavery is constitutional one day, then 20 years later is unconstitutional, the issue is the same, it's just that the court that has changed its mind.

Today's judges are not even restricting themselves to basic common sense or fundamental logic. They no longer present a legal reasoning, they just rationalize their preconceived result. We're a hair's breadth from simply ruling by decree in the manner of a mad tyrant.

The strategy is not new, however. The leading international parasitical banking families/interests have always sought out the legal system as a target to permeate then corrupt in nations they target as "hosts". In both Europe and the UK, members and minions of banking families very early on maneuvered into position to be able to practice law.